Reference — Cases, Codes & Court Documents
These are the real court documents and the verified argument recordings for the cases the lessons teach. Every link opens on its publisher’s own site — nothing is copied or re-hosted here. Where no verified recording exists, the entry says so plainly: Video/audio: none verified. This page is information only, not legal advice.
Category 4 — Contracts, Agreements & Secrets
Missouri v. Frye
566 U.S. 134 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 21, 2012
The Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel extends to plea bargaining; defense counsel must, as a general rule, communicate formal plea offers.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-negotiations.md · le-negotiations.md
Lafler v. Cooper
566 U.S. 156 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 21, 2012
Counsel's incorrect advice that led the client to reject a favorable plea offer satisfied the ineffective-assistance standard; the State must reoffer the plea.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-negotiations.md · le-negotiations.md
Category 5 — Abuse, Violence & Staying Safe
Mullaney v. Wilbur
421 U.S. 684 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 9, 1975
Due process requires the prosecution to prove the absence of heat of passion on sudden provocation beyond a reasonable doubt when the issue is properly raised.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-homicide.md · le-homicide.md · adult-manslaughter.md
State v. Williams
4 Wn. App. 908, 484 P.2d 1167 · Washington Court of Appeals, Division One · May 3, 1971
Manslaughter convictions affirmed — a death proximately caused by ordinary negligence in breaching a parental duty of care can support manslaughter.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-homicide.md · adult-manslaughter.md · le-manslaughter.md
Enmund v. Florida
458 U.S. 782 · Supreme Court of the United States · July 2, 1982
Death sentence reversed — the Eighth Amendment bars executing a felony-murder participant who did not kill, attempt to kill, or intend a killing or lethal force.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-homicide.md · adult-murder.md · le-murder.md
Tison v. Arizona
481 U.S. 137 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 21, 1987
Death sentences vacated and remanded — major participation in a felony plus reckless indifference to human life can satisfy the Eighth Amendment's culpability requirement.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-murder.md · le-murder.md
Tennessee v. Garner
471 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 27, 1985
Deadly force is a Fourth Amendment seizure and may not be used against an apparently unarmed, nondangerous fleeing suspect absent probable cause of a significant threat.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: le-homicide.md · le-manslaughter.md · le-murder.md
Furek v. University of Delaware
594 A.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Delaware · July 24, 1991
A legal basis existed for the university's duty to protect students from foreseeable hazing within its control; the judgment notwithstanding the verdict was reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-hazing-and-prevention.md · le-hazing-and-prevention.md · youth-hazing-and-prevention.md
Category 8 — Government Offices, Benefits & Civic Structure
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
549 U.S. 497 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 2, 2007
Massachusetts had standing to challenge the EPA; greenhouse gases are "air pollutants" under the Clean Air Act — reversed and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-attorney-generals-office.md · le-attorney-generals-office.md
Zivotofsky v. Kerry
576 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 8, 2015
The President's power to recognize foreign governments is exclusive; the passport-birthplace statute unconstitutionally infringed it.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-state-department.md
Haig v. Agee
453 U.S. 280 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 29, 1981
The Passport Act authorizes the Secretary of State to revoke a passport on national-security grounds; the revocation was upheld.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-state-department.md
Jacobson v. Massachusetts
197 U.S. 11 · Supreme Court of the United States · February 20, 1905
A state law authorizing local boards of health to require vaccination, enforced by a $5 fine, was upheld; reasonable public-health regulations under the police power stand.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-board-of-health.md
Printz v. United States
521 U.S. 898 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 27, 1997
Congress may not commandeer state and local officers to administer federal programs; the Brady Act's interim background-check command was unconstitutional.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-state-government-vs-city-government.md · le-state-government-vs-city-government.md
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
469 U.S. 528 · Supreme Court of the United States · February 19, 1985
Federal wage-and-overtime law applies to a municipal transit authority; "traditional governmental functions" immunity was overruled.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-state-government-vs-city-government.md · le-state-government-vs-city-government.md
Goldberg v. Kelly
397 U.S. 254 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 23, 1970
Due process requires an evidentiary hearing BEFORE needs-based welfare benefits are terminated; recipients won.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Listen: the actual oral argument
Taught in: adult-social-security.md
Mathews v. Eldridge
424 U.S. 319 · Supreme Court of the United States · February 24, 1976
No pre-termination hearing required for SSDI; the three-part balancing test governs and the post-termination hearing with back pay satisfied due process.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-social-security.md · adult-intake-process-in-all-roles.md (Category 9)
Flemming v. Nestor
363 U.S. 603 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 20, 1960
Social Security benefits are not an accrued contractual property right; Congress may alter the program.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-social-security.md
Cheek v. United States
498 U.S. 192 · Supreme Court of the United States · January 8, 1991
A good-faith misunderstanding of tax law negates willfulness even if unreasonable; convictions vacated and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-taxes.md
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
348 U.S. 426 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 28, 1955
Punitive damages are gross income under the Code's broad definition; the government won.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-taxes.md
Category 9 — Health, Treatment & Recovery
Jaffee v. Redmond
518 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 13, 1996
Federal psychotherapist-patient privilege recognized and applied to a licensed clinical social worker; counseling notes protected from compelled disclosure.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-counseling-vs-therapy.md
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
17 Cal.3d 425 · Supreme Court of California · July 1, 1976
A therapist bears a duty to use reasonable care to protect a foreseeable person in serious danger.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-counseling-vs-therapy.md
Robinson v. California
370 U.S. 660 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 25, 1962
Punishing the status of addiction is cruel and unusual punishment; conviction reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-addictions.md · youth-addictions.md (also pointed to from adult-rehabs.md and adult-detox.md)
Powell v. Texas
392 U.S. 514 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 17, 1968
A divided Court left a public-intoxication conviction standing; the plurality treated it as punishment of an act in public, not status alone.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-addictions.md
Olmstead v. L.C.
527 U.S. 581 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 22, 1999
Unjustified institutional isolation is discrimination under ADA Title II; community placement required when appropriate, not opposed, and reasonably accommodatable.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-inpatient-and-outpatient.md
Youngberg v. Romeo
457 U.S. 307 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 18, 1982
A person held involuntarily keeps liberty interests in safe conditions, freedom from unreasonable restraint, and minimally adequate training, judged under the professional-judgment standard.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-inpatient-and-outpatient.md
O'Connor v. Donaldson
422 U.S. 563 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 26, 1975
A state may not constitutionally confine, without more, a non-dangerous person who can survive safely in freedom alone or with willing help.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-voluntary-vs-involuntary.md · le-voluntary-vs-involuntary.md
Addington v. Texas
441 U.S. 418 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 30, 1979
Due process requires proof by clear and convincing evidence for indefinite civil commitment.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Listen: the actual oral argument
Taught in: adult-voluntary-vs-involuntary.md · le-voluntary-vs-involuntary.md
Estelle v. Gamble
429 U.S. 97 · Supreme Court of the United States · November 30, 1976
Deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious medical needs violates the Eighth Amendment — taught at the level of principle: the duty of care owed to people in custody.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: le-suicide-and-suicide-prevention.md
Category 10 — Identification, Data, Records & Truth
Maryland v. King
569 U.S. 435 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 3, 2013
A booking cheek-swab DNA sample after a probable-cause arrest for a serious offense is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate booking procedure reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Listen: the actual oral argument
Taught in: adult-fingerprinting.md · le-fingerprinting.md
Hayes v. Florida
470 U.S. 811 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 20, 1985
A station detention for fingerprinting without probable cause, consent, or prior judicial authorization violated the Fourth Amendment; the fingerprints were inadmissible.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-fingerprinting.md · le-fingerprinting.md
Davis v. Mississippi
394 U.S. 721 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 22, 1969
Fingerprint evidence is no exception to the exclusionary rule; detentions solely to obtain fingerprints are governed by the Fourth Amendment.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-fingerprinting.md · le-fingerprinting.md
Frazier v. Cupp
394 U.S. 731 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 22, 1969
Judged on the totality of the circumstances, the confession was voluntary; an officer's false statement about an accomplice did not by itself make it inadmissible.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-recognizing-lies-and-truth.md · le-recognizing-lies-and-truth.md
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
564 U.S. 261 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 16, 2011
A child's age, when known to the officer or objectively apparent, properly informs the Miranda custody analysis.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-recognizing-lies-and-truth.md · le-recognizing-lies-and-truth.md · youth-recognizing-lies-and-truth.md
U.S. Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
489 U.S. 749 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 22, 1989
A compiled FBI rap sheet about a private citizen is protected under FOIA Exemption 7(C); its disclosure would invade personal privacy.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-pii-personally-identifiable-information.md · le-pii-personally-identifiable-information.md · adult-records-departments-in-all-roles.md · le-records-departments-in-all-roles.md
TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez
594 U.S. 413 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 25, 2021
Only class members whose misleading reports were actually disseminated to third parties had standing — "No concrete harm, no standing."
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-data-breaches.md · le-data-breaches.md
G&G Oil Co. of Indiana v. Continental Western Insurance Co.
165 N.E.3d 82 · Indiana Supreme Court · March 18, 2021
A ransom payment resulted directly from the use of a computer under the policy's computer-fraud provision, but fraudulence could not be decided on the record; remanded — neither side won coverage outright.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ransomware-attacks.md · le-ransomware-attacks.md
Cases — full verified records (Wave 3)
Caetano v. Massachusetts
577 U.S. 411 · U.S. Supreme Court (per curiam) · March 21, 2016
Per curiam: all three reasons the Supreme Judicial Court gave for upholding Massachusetts' stun-gun ban (not in existence at the founding; unusual; not readily adaptable to military use) contradicted Heller. Judgment vacated and case remanded. (Alito concurrence, joined by Thomas, recites the facts: the defendant possessed the stun gun for protection from an abusive former boyfriend.) Decided on the papers; no oral argument.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-weapons-laws-by-state.md; le-weapons-laws-by-state.md
Counterman v. Colorado
600 U.S. 66 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 27, 2023
A true-threat prosecution must prove a subjective mental state; recklessness — conscious disregard of a substantial risk that the statements would be viewed as threatening violence — is sufficient. The conviction, obtained without that proof, was vacated and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-social-media-crimes, le-social-media-crimes, youth-social-media-crimes
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 28, 1993
The Federal Rules of Evidence (Rule 702) displaced Frye in federal court; the trial judge is the gatekeeper who must find expert testimony reliable and relevant, guided by factors including testability, peer review and publication, known or potential error rate, controlling standards, and acceptance. Judgment vacated and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-forensic-science, le-forensic-science, youth-forensic-science
District of Columbia v. Heller
554 U.S. 570 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 26, 2008
Held 5–4 (Scalia, J.) that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, including self-defense in the home; judgment for Heller affirmed. The right is not unlimited: longstanding prohibitions for felons and the mentally ill and laws barring firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings stand.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Oyez case page carries the oral-argument audio
Taught in: adult-weapons-laws-by-state.md; le-weapons-laws-by-state.md; adult-licensed-to-carry-by-state.md; le-licensed-to-carry-by-state.md
Elonis v. United States
575 U.S. 723 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 1, 2015
Negligence about how statements would be understood is not enough under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c); a greater mental state is required. Conviction reversed and remanded on statutory grounds; the First Amendment question was not reached.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-social-media-crimes, le-social-media-crimes, youth-social-media-crimes
Frye v. United States
293 F. 1013 · Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia · December 3, 1923
Announced the general-acceptance test for novel scientific evidence; the systolic blood-pressure deception test, not yet generally accepted, was properly excluded and the conviction was affirmed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-forensic-science, le-forensic-science, youth-forensic-science
Commonwealth v. Lanigan
419 Mass. 15 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · November 18, 1994
Massachusetts accepted Daubert's reasoning: reliability may be shown by means other than general acceptance. DNA evidence using the ceiling principle was correctly admitted; the convictions stood. Origin of the "Daubert–Lanigan hearing."
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-forensic-science, le-forensic-science, youth-forensic-science
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
557 U.S. 305 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 25, 2009
Sworn laboratory certificates of analysis are testimonial affidavits; the analysts are witnesses subject to the Confrontation Clause, so the certificates alone could not be admitted. Conviction reversed and remanded; notice-and-demand statutes are constitutional.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-forensic-science, le-forensic-science, youth-forensic-science
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen
597 U.S. 1 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 2022
Held 6–3 (Thomas, J.) that New York's proper-cause (special-need) requirement for an unrestricted public-carry license violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments; set the text, history, and tradition test; court of appeals reversed and case remanded. The opinion counts 43 shall-issue states against 6 may-issue states and the District of Columbia, and names Massachusetts' former "good reason" language as an analogue (n.2). Kavanaugh concurrence (Roberts, C.J., joining) preserves objective shall-issue licensing (background checks, fingerprinting, training, mental-health records checks).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Oyez case page carries the oral-argument audio
Taught in: adult-weapons-laws-by-state.md; le-weapons-laws-by-state.md; adult-licensed-to-carry-by-state.md; le-licensed-to-carry-by-state.md
Packingham v. North Carolina
582 U.S. 98 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 19, 2017
North Carolina's blanket ban on social-media access for registered sex offenders violated the First Amendment: it burdened substantially more speech than necessary to serve the state's interest. Conviction reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-social-media-crimes, le-social-media-crimes, youth-social-media-crimes
Wave 4 — Change, Behavior & Consent
Brown v. Board of Education
347 U.S. 483 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 17, 1954
State laws establishing separate public schools for Black and white students are unconstitutional — "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-positive-change.md · le-positive-change.md · youth-positive-change.md · adult-ending-racism-foundations-communities.md · youth-ending-racism.md (as a true story)
Canterbury v. Spence
464 F.2d 772 · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · May 19, 1972
A patient's consent is only real if the physician disclosed the material risks first — the standard is what a reasonable patient would want to know, not what doctors customarily mention.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-treatments.md
Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 10, 1968
An officer who observes unusual conduct reasonably suggesting criminal activity may briefly stop the person to investigate, and may pat down outer clothing for weapons on specific facts suggesting the person is armed and dangerous; conviction affirmed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: le-patterns-and-behaviors.md · adult-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md · le-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md
Wave 4-B — Courts, Systems & RICO
H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
492 U.S. 229 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 26, 1989
A RICO "pattern" requires related predicate acts plus continuity ("continuity plus relationship") — closed-ended or open-ended — and a single scheme can qualify; the dismissal under a multiple-schemes test was reversed and remanded. Opinion by Justice Brennan. No. 87-1252, argued November 8, 1988.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-racketeering-and-rico.md · le-racketeering-and-rico.md
Marbury v. Madison
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 · U.S. Supreme Court · February 24, 1803
Marbury was entitled to his commission, but the Judiciary Act provision authorizing his direct filing in the Supreme Court conflicted with the Constitution and was void — the decision that established judicial review in the United States.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-judicial-systems-usa-vs-the-world.md · le-judicial-systems-usa-vs-the-world.md
Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., Inc.
473 U.S. 479 · U.S. Supreme Court · July 1, 1985
A private civil RICO action under § 1964(c) requires no prior criminal conviction and no separate "racketeering injury" — injury to business or property from the predicate acts themselves suffices; the Second Circuit's contrary judgment (741 F.2d 482) was reversed and remanded. Opinion by Justice White (5–4). No. 84-648, argued April 17, 1985.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-racketeering-and-rico.md · le-racketeering-and-rico.md
United States v. Turkette
452 U.S. 576 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 17, 1981
"Enterprise" under RICO includes wholly criminal organizations, and the enterprise is an element separate from the pattern of racketeering activity; the First Circuit's contrary ruling (632 F.2d 896) was reversed. Opinion by Justice White (8–1). No. 80-808, argued April 27, 1981.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-racketeering-and-rico.md · le-racketeering-and-rico.md
Wave 4-C — Cloning & Chip Technology
Girardi v. Emotiv
Supreme Court of Chile, judgment of August 9, 2023 (case known by party names; Chilean judgments are published in Spanish through court channels) · Supreme Court of Chile · August 9, 2023
Applying Chile's 2021 constitutional neurorights reform, the Court ordered Emotiv to delete the plaintiff's brain data collected by its consumer neurotechnology headset — the first decided neurorights case.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-human-chip-technology.md · le-human-chip-technology.md
In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)
750 F.3d 1333 · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · May 8, 2014
Patent claims covering cloned animals themselves held unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101 — an exact genetic replica of a natural animal (Dolly) is not a patentable invention; the method patent was not at issue.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-human-cloning.md · le-human-cloning.md
Wave 4-D — Health, Privacy & Custody Research
Buck v. Bell
274 U.S. 200 · U.S. Supreme Court · May 2, 1927
Virginia's compulsory-sterilization statute upheld 8–1. Status taught precisely: never formally overruled; broadly condemned and repudiated in later law and teaching; undercut in reasoning by Skinner (1942).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-prisoners-as-research-subjects.md
Carey v. Population Services International
431 U.S. 678 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 9, 1977
New York's restrictions — pharmacist-only distribution of nonprescription contraceptives, bar on distribution to minors under 16, and ban on advertising — struck down.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-birth-control-and-methods.md
Eisenstadt v. Baird
405 U.S. 438 · U.S. Supreme Court · March 22, 1972
Massachusetts law limiting contraceptive distribution to married people struck down on equal-protection grounds; the right belongs to the individual, married or single.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-birth-control-and-methods.md
Griswold v. Connecticut
381 U.S. 479 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 7, 1965
Connecticut's ban on contraceptive use struck down, 7–2; the Bill of Rights' guarantees create zones of privacy protecting married couples' contraceptive decisions.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-birth-control-and-methods.md
Skinner v. Oklahoma
316 U.S. 535 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 1, 1942
Oklahoma's Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act struck down unanimously on equal-protection grounds; procreation is a fundamental right.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-prisoners-as-research-subjects.md · le-prisoners-as-research-subjects.md
White County, Tennessee standing order (document study — not a decided case)
Standing Order, General Sessions Court, White County, Tennessee (Judge Sam Benningfield), issued May 15, 2017; rescinded July 26, 2017 · White County General Sessions Court (standing order); Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct (public reprimand, November 2017) · May 15, 2017 (order); July 26, 2017 (rescission); November 15, 2017 (reprimand letter, as reported)
30-day jail credit for vasectomy or contraceptive implant offered, then rescinded after ACLU-TN and national criticism called it unconstitutional coercion; credit preserved for those who had already signed up; judge publicly reprimanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-prisoners-as-research-subjects.md · le-prisoners-as-research-subjects.md
Wave 4-E — Capital Punishment & Custody Conditions
Ashker v. Governor of California (settlement)
No. 4:09-cv-05796 (N.D. Cal.) — class-action settlement · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · Settlement announced September 1, 2015; final approval January 26, 2016
Settlement ended indeterminate SHU terms based on gang validation alone; placement became behavior-based, with caps at Pelican Bay and a roughly two-year step-down; about 1,500 people were transferred out of SHU in its wake. At filing, 500+ people had spent 10+ years in the Pelican Bay SHU and 78 had spent 20+ years, under a regime of 22½–24 hours a day in windowless cells with no phone calls or contact visits.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md · le-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md
Atkins v. Virginia
536 U.S. 304 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 20, 2002
Executing people with intellectual disability is cruel and unusual punishment.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Baze v. Rees
553 U.S. 35 · U.S. Supreme Court · April 16, 2008
Holding only — a method-of-execution challenge must show a substantial risk of serious harm measured against a known, feasible alternative; the challenge brought failed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Bucklew v. Precythe
587 U.S. 119 · U.S. Supreme Court · April 1, 2019
Taught in outline only — the Baze/Glossip framework applied to an as-applied challenge based on the prisoner's medical condition; the challenge failed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Coker v. Georgia
433 U.S. 584 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 29, 1977
Death held grossly disproportionate for the rape of an adult.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Commonwealth v. Colon-Cruz
393 Mass. 150 (470 N.E.2d 116) · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · October 18, 1984
The 1982 Massachusetts death-penalty statute held unconstitutional (it impermissibly burdened the rights against self-incrimination and to trial by jury); Massachusetts has had no valid death penalty since, and life without parole is the maximum state sentence.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Ford v. Wainwright
477 U.S. 399 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 26, 1986
The Eighth Amendment bars executing a person who is incompetent at the time of execution.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Furman v. Georgia
408 U.S. 238 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 29, 1972
Per curiam — death sentences as then imposed, under standardless jury discretion, held unconstitutional; executions halted nationwide.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Glossip v. Gross
576 U.S. 863 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 29, 2015
Holding only — prisoners challenging a method of execution must identify a known and available alternative that significantly reduces the risk of severe pain.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Gregg v. Georgia
428 U.S. 153 · U.S. Supreme Court · July 2, 1976
Guided-discretion statutes with bifurcated guilt/penalty phases upheld; the death penalty itself is not inherently unconstitutional.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Hall v. Florida
572 U.S. 701 · U.S. Supreme Court · May 27, 2014
A rigid IQ-70 cutoff is unconstitutional; courts must account for the standard error of measurement and evidence of adaptive functioning.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Hutto v. Finney
437 U.S. 678 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1978
Federal remedial order upheld, including a 30-day ceiling on punitive isolation; prison conditions judged under the totality of circumstances.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md · le-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md
Kennedy v. Louisiana
554 U.S. 407 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 2008
Death barred for child rape where the victim's death was not caused or intended; offenses against the state (treason, espionage) expressly reserved.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Madrid v. Gomez
889 F. Supp. 1146 · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · 1995
Taught in outline — Pelican Bay: inadequate medical/mental-health care and a pattern of excessive force found; SHU confinement crossed the constitutional line for the mentally ill and those at risk, though not held unconstitutional for all prisoners.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md · le-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md
McCleskey v. Kemp
481 U.S. 279 · U.S. Supreme Court · April 22, 1987
The Baldus study's system-wide statistics (4.3× odds in white-victim cases after controlling 230 variables) did not prove discrimination in the individual case; an equal-protection claim requires proof of discriminatory purpose in the defendant's own case.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Penry v. Lynaugh
492 U.S. 302 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 26, 1989
Taught in outline only — sentencing procedures must allow the sentencer to consider and give effect to mitigating evidence.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Porter v. Clarke
923 F.3d 348 · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2019 (opinion amended May 6, 2019)
Virginia's death-row conditions at Sussex I — 71 sq ft cells, 23–24 hours a day in cell, one hour of outdoor recreation five days a week alone in wire-mesh enclosures, meals in cell, no congregate programming or worship, noncontact visits only, cells lit around the clock — held to violate the Eighth Amendment; the first federal appeals court so to hold for death-row solitary.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md · le-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md
Roper v. Simmons
543 U.S. 551 · U.S. Supreme Court · March 1, 2005
The death penalty may not be imposed for crimes committed under age 18.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Wilkinson v. Austin
545 U.S. 209 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 13, 2005
Supermax placement implicates a liberty interest; Ohio's notice, hearing, statement of reasons, and periodic review satisfied due process.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md · le-death-row-solitary-and-general-population.md
Woodson v. North Carolina
428 U.S. 280 · U.S. Supreme Court · July 2, 1976
Mandatory death sentences struck down; individualized sentencing required.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-capital-punishment-and-execution.md · le-capital-punishment-and-execution.md
Wave 4-F — Travel, Borders & Jurisdiction
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute
499 U.S. 585 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 17, 1991
The forum-selection clause printed in a standard cruise ticket (all disputes in Florida) is enforceable against a Washington passenger injured in international waters off Mexico, even though the clause was never negotiated (7–2).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md
Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
435 U.S. 191 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 6, 1978
Tribal courts lack inherent criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians absent congressional authorization (6–2); Congress later recognized a limited exception — the Violence Against Women Act's special tribal criminal jurisdiction over certain crimes by non-Indians, beginning with domestic violence.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md · le-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
422 U.S. 873 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 30, 1975
A roving-patrol stop near the border requires reasonable suspicion from specific, articulable facts; the occupants' apparent Mexican ancestry alone cannot justify the stop; further detention or search requires consent or probable cause.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md · le-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md
United States v. Cordova
89 F. Supp. 298 · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York · March 17, 1950
Assaults aboard a U.S. airliner over the high seas (San Juan–New York, Aug. 2, 1948) were proved, but judgment was arrested — the maritime statutes reached "vessels," not aircraft, so no federal jurisdiction existed; Congress later closed the gap with the special aircraft jurisdiction (today 49 U.S.C. ch. 465).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-air.md
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
428 U.S. 543 · Supreme Court of the United States · July 6, 1976
Routine stops and brief questioning at permanent immigration checkpoints (San Clemente, CA; Sarita, TX) are consistent with the Fourth Amendment without individualized suspicion; checkpoint vehicle searches still require consent or probable cause (United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 (1975)).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md · le-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md
United States v. Muse
No. 09 Cr. 512 (LAP) · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · Guilty plea May 18, 2010; sentenced February 16, 2011
Abduwali Muse, the surviving pirate from the April 8, 2009 seizure of the U.S.-flagged Maersk Alabama and the hostage-taking of Capt. Richard Phillips, pleaded guilty to hijacking maritime vessels, kidnapping, and hostage taking (the piracy count was resolved within the plea) and was sentenced to 405 months in prison and $550,000 restitution.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md · le-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md
United States v. Ramsey
431 U.S. 606 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 6, 1977
Warrantless customs opening of suspicious incoming international mail upheld — searches at the border are reasonable simply by virtue of occurring at the border (the border-search exception).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md · le-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md
United States v. Said
680 F.3d 374 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 23, 2012
Dismissal of the piracy count vacated — "piracy as defined by the law of nations" in 18 U.S.C. § 1651 follows the modern international (UNCLOS) definition, which covers violent attacks on the high seas and does not require a completed robbery; companion case United States v. Dire, 680 F.3d 446 (4th Cir. 2012), decided the same day, upheld piracy convictions; certiorari denied January 22, 2013.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md · le-traveling-by-sea-and-land.md
United States v. Yunis
924 F.2d 1086 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · January 29, 1991
Convictions for air piracy and hostage taking (1985 hijacking of Royal Jordanian Flight 402; defendant lured onto a yacht in international waters and arrested by the FBI) affirmed — U.S. jurisdiction supported by Congress's statutes and by the universal and passive personality principles of international law.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-traveling-by-air.md · le-traveling-by-air.md
Wave 4-G — Surveillance, Wiretapping & the Home
Berger v. New York
388 U.S. 41 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 12, 1967
New York's eavesdropping statute was held unconstitutional on its face for lack of particularized probable cause, particular description, and strict duration/termination safeguards under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md · le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md
Carpenter v. United States
585 U.S. 296 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 22, 2018
5–4 — government acquisition of historical cell-site location information covering seven days or more is a Fourth Amendment search; an order under the Stored Communications Act is not enough and a warrant is generally required; conviction reversed and case remanded. (Facts verified: 12,898 location points over 127 days.)
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md · le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md · youth-when-someone-is-watching-your-phone.md (one plain-language principle entry) · le-background-checks-the-lawful-way.md
FTC, In the Matter of Support King, LLC (SpyFone)
FTC Matter/File No. 192 3003; Docket No. C-4756 (administrative consent order — an enforcement record, not a court case) · Federal Trade Commission (administrative) · September 1, 2021 (ban announced — the FTC's first stalkerware ban); final order announced December 21, 2021
Support King, LLC (SpyFone.com) and CEO Scott Zuckerman were banned from offering, promoting, selling, or advertising any surveillance app, service, or business — the FTC's first surveillance-business ban — and ordered to delete illegally collected data and notify owners of monitored devices; Commission vote 4–0 to finalize. (A 2025 petition to vacate or modify was denied Dec 8, 2025, per the Adult hidden-technology fragment.)
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-hidden-technology-in-the-home.md · le-hidden-technology-in-the-home.md · adult-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md (context) · le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md (context)
Katz v. United States
389 U.S. 347 · Supreme Court of the United States · December 18, 1967
Warrantless electronic eavesdropping on a telephone booth was a Fourth Amendment search — the Amendment protects people, not places; conviction reversed; Justice Harlan's concurrence states the two-question reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md · le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md
Kyllo v. United States
533 U.S. 27 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 11, 2001
Warrantless thermal imaging of a home using sense-enhancing technology not in general public use, to learn details otherwise requiring physical entry, is a Fourth Amendment search, presumptively unreasonable without a warrant; reversed and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md · le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md
Olmstead v. United States
277 U.S. 438 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 4, 1928
Wiretapping accomplished without physical trespass was held outside the Fourth and Fifth Amendments and the convictions stood — reasoning later displaced by Katz.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md · le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md
Riley v. California
573 U.S. 373 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 25, 2014
Unanimous — police generally may not search digital information on a cell phone seized incident to arrest without a warrant; judgment against Riley reversed (companion case Wurie affirmed).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md (full entry) · le-hidden-technology-in-the-home.md (outline citation only)
United States v. Hammad Akbar (StealthGenie)
Criminal No. 1:14-cr-276 (E.D. Va.); related civil action Civil No. 1:14-cv-1273 (LMB/IDD) (E.D. Va.) — criminal enforcement record (guilty plea) · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia · November 25, 2014 (guilty plea and sentencing; indictment announced Sept 29–30, 2014)
Akbar pleaded guilty to sale of an interception device and advertisement of a device he knew was primarily for surreptitious interception (18 U.S.C. § 2512), was sentenced to time served, ordered to pay a $500,000 fine, and forfeited the StealthGenie source code — the first criminal conviction for advertising and selling a mobile spyware (stalking) app.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-hidden-technology-in-the-home.md · le-hidden-technology-in-the-home.md
United States v. Jones
565 U.S. 400 · Supreme Court of the United States · January 23, 2012
Attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements for 28 days was a trespassory Fourth Amendment search (physical intrusion on an effect to obtain information); the D.C. Circuit's judgment was affirmed (unanimous judgment; concurrences reasoned on prolonged-monitoring privacy grounds).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md · le-wiretapping-and-illegal-surveillance.md
Wave 4-H — Silence, Innocence & Profiling
Baxter v. Palmigiano
425 U.S. 308 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 20, 1976
In civil (prison disciplinary) proceedings, silence may support an adverse inference; the criminal-trial protection does not carry over.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md
Berghuis v. Thompkins
560 U.S. 370 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 1, 2010
Nearly three hours of mostly silence during interrogation did not invoke the right to remain silent — invocation must be unambiguous — and the suspect's eventual answer was a waiver; conviction upheld.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md · le-right-to-remain-silent.md
Carter v. Kentucky
450 U.S. 288 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 9, 1981
On request, a defendant who does not testify is entitled to a no-adverse-inference instruction.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md
Coffin v. United States
156 U.S. 432 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 4, 1895
The presumption of innocence is "the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary" (quote verified verbatim in the opinion text), and a jury must be instructed on it when requested; conviction reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md
Commonwealth v. A Juvenile (No. 1)
389 Mass. 128, 449 N.E.2d 654 · Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts · May 10, 1983
For a juvenile under 14, no Miranda waiver is effective without the interested-adult protection — a parent or interested adult present who understands the warnings and has a genuine opportunity to explain them; at 14 and older, meaningful consultation is ordinarily required, and a waiver without it counts only on a showing of a high degree of intelligence, experience, knowledge, or sophistication; judgment reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: le-right-to-remain-silent.md (featured) · youth-your-rights-when-police-question-you.md (plain-words retelling)
Davis v. United States
512 U.S. 452 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 24, 1994
An ambiguous reference to counsel ("Maybe I should talk to a lawyer") is not an invocation of the right to counsel; officers may clarify or stop.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md · le-right-to-remain-silent.md
Doyle v. Ohio
426 U.S. 610 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 17, 1976
A defendant's silence after Miranda warnings may not be used to impeach his trial testimony — the warnings carry an implicit assurance; convictions reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md (featured) · le-right-to-remain-silent.md (taught in Part 4)
Edwards v. Arizona
451 U.S. 477 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 18, 1981
After a suspect invokes the right to counsel in custody, police may not re-initiate interrogation — only the suspect or counsel can reopen it; conviction reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: le-right-to-remain-silent.md (featured) · adult-right-to-remain-silent.md (taught in Parts)
Floyd v. City of New York
959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (liability); remedies at 959 F. Supp. 2d 668 · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, J.) · August 12, 2013
The City was liable under the Fourth Amendment (deliberate indifference to practices so widespread they had the force of law) and the Fourteenth Amendment (a policy of indirect racial profiling), on a record of 4.4 million stops from January 2004 to June 2012, about 83 percent of them of Black and Hispanic people, 88 percent resulting in no further law enforcement action (figures verified in the opinion text); remedies ordered an independent monitor, policy/training/supervision reforms, a joint remedial process, and a body-camera pilot.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md · le-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md
Griffin v. California
380 U.S. 609 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 28, 1965
The Fifth Amendment forbids prosecutorial or judicial comment on the defendant's failure to testify; conviction reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md
Harris v. New York
401 U.S. 222 · Supreme Court of the United States · February 24, 1971
A voluntary statement taken in violation of Miranda may still be used to impeach the defendant's own trial testimony.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court
542 U.S. 177 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 21, 2004
A stop-and-identify statute requiring a lawfully stopped person to give a name does not violate the Fourth or Fifth Amendments.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md
In re Winship
397 U.S. 358 · Supreme Court of the United States · March 31, 1970
Due process requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases and in juvenile adjudications of acts that would be crimes if done by an adult; adjudication reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md
Michigan v. Mosley
423 U.S. 96 · Supreme Court of the United States · December 9, 1975
After an invocation of silence, questioning may resume only where the right was "scrupulously honored" — an immediate stop, a significant lapse of time, fresh warnings, and a different crime.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md · le-right-to-remain-silent.md
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 13, 1966
Statements from custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless the prosecution shows the warnings were given and the rights waived; convictions reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md · le-right-to-remain-silent.md · youth-your-rights-when-police-question-you.md (plain-words retelling)
New York v. Quarles
467 U.S. 649 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 12, 1984
The public-safety exception permits narrow unwarned questions aimed at an immediate danger.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md · le-right-to-remain-silent.md
Salinas v. Texas
570 U.S. 178 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 17, 2013
PLURALITY decision — in a pre-arrest, non-custodial interview, a suspect's silence could be commented on because he never expressly invoked the privilege; conviction stood. The units state the plurality status precisely and never as a majority holding.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md (featured) · le-right-to-remain-silent.md (taught in Parts)
Schmerber v. California
384 U.S. 757 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 20, 1966
The privilege against self-incrimination covers testimonial evidence, not the body as physical evidence; a compelled blood draw was upheld.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md
Stack v. Boyle
342 U.S. 1 · Supreme Court of the United States · November 5, 1951
Bail set above an amount reasonably calculated to assure the defendant's appearance is "excessive" under the Eighth Amendment; judgment vacated and remanded for individualized bail determinations.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md · le-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md
United States v. Patane
542 U.S. 630 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 28, 2004
PLURALITY — the physical fruits of a voluntary but unwarned statement are not suppressed.
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-right-to-remain-silent.md
Whren v. United States
517 U.S. 806 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 10, 1996
Unanimous — a traffic stop supported by probable cause is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment regardless of the officer's actual motive; claims of race-based selective enforcement belong to the Equal Protection Clause; convictions affirmed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md · le-presumption-of-innocence-and-racial-profiling.md
Wave 4-I — Ending Racism
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
401 U.S. 424 · U.S. Supreme Court · March 8, 1971
Unanimous — under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employment requirements that operate to disqualify a substantially higher rate of one race and are not shown to be related to job performance are unlawful, even without proof of discriminatory purpose (the disparate-impact holding).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-governments-religions.md
Loving v. Virginia
388 U.S. 1 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 12, 1967
Unanimous — Virginia's anti-miscegenation statutes struck down; racial classifications are subject to the most rigid scrutiny, and marriage is a fundamental freedom the state may not deny on racial grounds (Equal Protection and Due Process, Fourteenth Amendment).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-foundations-communities.md
Plessy v. Ferguson
163 U.S. 537 · U.S. Supreme Court · May 18, 1896
Louisiana's Separate Car Act upheld 7–1 — state-required "equal but separate" railway accommodations held not to violate the Thirteenth or Fourteenth Amendments (the "separate but equal" doctrine; repudiated in public education by Brown).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-foundations-communities.md
Shelby County v. Holder
570 U.S. 529 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 2013
Held 5–4 — § 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, the coverage formula that determined which jurisdictions were subject to § 5 preclearance, is unconstitutional; the formula may no longer be used, leaving § 5 without an operating coverage formula unless Congress enacts a new one (§ 5 itself was not struck down, and § 2 was not at issue).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-governments-religions.md
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
600 U.S. 181 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 29, 2023
The First Circuit was reversed (decided together with the University of North Carolina case, No. 21-707) — Harvard's and UNC's race-conscious admissions programs violate the Equal Protection Clause (Harvard via Title VI, which is coextensive with equal protection) because they lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives, employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points; the decision did not bar considering an applicant's discussion of how race affected the applicant's life when tied to character or unique ability.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-governments-religions.md
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
576 U.S. 519 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 2015
The Fifth Circuit was affirmed and the case remanded, 5–4 — disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act, with safeguards: a plaintiff must prove a defendant's policy actually causes the disparity, and defendants must be given leeway to state valid interests the policy serves.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-governments-religions.md · adult-housing-stability.md · youth-housing-stability.md
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
429 U.S. 252 · U.S. Supreme Court · January 11, 1977
The Seventh Circuit was reversed and the case remanded — the Village's denial of rezoning for an integrated low- and moderate-income housing project did not violate the Equal Protection Clause on this record; discriminatory purpose must be proved, and the Court set out the circumstantial-evidence inquiry (impact, historical background, sequence of events, departures, and legislative/administrative history) for proving it; the Fair Housing Act claim was left for remand.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-governments-religions.md
Washington v. Davis
426 U.S. 229 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 7, 1976
The D.C. Circuit was reversed — a law or official act is not unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment's equal-protection component solely because it has a racially disproportionate impact; proof of discriminatory purpose is required for a constitutional claim (disparate impact remains relevant evidence of purpose, and statutory disparate-impact claims under Title VII were distinguished).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-racism-governments-religions.md · le-ending-racism.md
Wave 4-J — Ending Slavery & Background Checks
Bailey v. Alabama
219 U.S. 219 · Supreme Court of the United States · January 3, 1911
Alabama's statute — treating a worker's failure to perform or refund an advance as prima facie evidence of fraud — violated the Thirteenth Amendment and the Peonage Act: its natural effect was to compel personal service in payment of a debt (peonage); the conviction was reversed. A state may not do indirectly, by presumption, what it may not do directly.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md · le-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
392 U.S. 409 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 17, 1968
42 U.S.C. § 1982 bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale and rental of property, as a valid exercise of Congress's Thirteenth Amendment power to legislate against the badges and incidents of slavery.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md
Pollock v. Williams
322 U.S. 4 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 10, 1944
Florida's labor-fraud statute violated the Thirteenth Amendment and the Anti-Peonage Act and was invalid in full; the guilty plea did not save the conviction, because the plea was itself a product of the statute's coercive threat; conviction reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md
Taylor v. Georgia
315 U.S. 25 · Supreme Court of the United States · January 12, 1942
Georgia's statutes — criminalizing taking an advance with intent not to perform, and treating failure to perform or repay as presumptive evidence of that intent — violated the Thirteenth Amendment and the Act of 1867: a worker bound by threat of penal sanction to remain until the debt is discharged is held in peonage; conviction reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md
United States v. Kozminski
487 U.S. 931 · Supreme Court of the United States · June 29, 1988
For prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 1584, "involuntary servitude" is limited to compulsion by use or threat of physical restraint or injury, or coercion through law or legal process — psychological coercion alone does not suffice under those statutes; the convictions were reversed and the case remanded. Congress later legislated past this limit in 18 U.S.C. § 1589.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md · le-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md
United States v. Reynolds
235 U.S. 133 · Supreme Court of the United States · 1914 (the unit states the year only; no exact decision date is given in the unit)
The surety system was held to be peonage: a person who paid a convicted person's fine took his labor by contract, and quitting brought new prosecution, so the constant fear of punishment compelled the labor. (Taught in the Adult unit's lesson; the unit gives the year only and no document link — see the merge log's gap list.)
📄 Court document: none verified · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-ending-slavery-in-all-forms.md
Wave 4-K — Accusations & Evidence
Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 · U.S. Supreme Court · May 13, 1963
Suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to the accused, material to guilt or punishment, violates due process regardless of the prosecution's good or bad faith; the judgment restricting Brady's new trial to punishment was affirmed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-defending-against-false-accusations.md · le-defending-against-false-accusations.md
The Central Park Five (New York, 1989–2002)
Case study — no reporter citation · New York (convictions vacated, Justice Charles Tejada) · Convictions vacated December 19, 2002
Five teenagers (ages 14–16) were convicted in 1990 for the 1989 Central Park jogger attack, in trials resting largely on videotaped confessions they later said were coerced; DNA from the scene matched none of them. In 2002 Matias Reyes confessed that he alone had committed the attack and his DNA matched; the convictions were vacated on December 19, 2002. New York City settled the civil suit for $41 million in 2014, and New York State settled for $3.9 million in 2016.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-defending-against-false-accusations.md
Fletcher v. Dorchester Mutual Insurance Co.
437 Mass. 544, 773 N.E.2d 420 · Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts · August 16, 2002
Massachusetts does not recognize a separate tort of spoliation of evidence; the duty to preserve arises when a party knows or reasonably should know evidence may be relevant to litigation, remedies are sanctions within the affected case, and nonparties owe no general duty to preserve evidence for others; the dismissals were affirmed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-collecting-and-filing-evidence-offline.md · le-collecting-and-filing-evidence-offline.md
Garrity v. New Jersey
385 U.S. 493 · U.S. Supreme Court · January 16, 1967
Statements compelled from public employees under threat of removal from office were involuntary and may not be used against them in criminal proceedings; the convictions were reversed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-defending-against-false-accusations.md
Giglio v. United States
405 U.S. 150 · U.S. Supreme Court · February 24, 1972
The government's failure to disclose the promise of non-prosecution made to its key witness violated due process — impeachment material must be disclosed — and a new trial was required; reversed and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-defending-against-false-accusations.md · le-defending-against-false-accusations.md
Glik v. Cunniffe
655 F.3d 78 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · August 26, 2011
The right to film police performing their duties in a public place was clearly established; Glik's arrest under the Massachusetts wiretap law violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights, the officers were not entitled to qualified immunity, and the denial of qualified immunity was affirmed (Boston later settled the case for $170,000).
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-collecting-and-filing-evidence-offline.md
Kyles v. Whitley
514 U.S. 419 · U.S. Supreme Court · April 19, 1995
The prosecutor's disclosure duty extends to favorable evidence known to police and others on the government's team, materiality is judged cumulatively on the whole record, and Kyles was entitled to a new trial; the court of appeals was reversed and the case remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: le-defending-against-false-accusations.md
NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
420 U.S. 251 · U.S. Supreme Court · February 19, 1975
A unionized employee is entitled to a union representative at an investigatory interview the employee reasonably believes may result in discipline; denying the request was an unfair labor practice; the court of appeals was reversed and the case remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-defending-against-false-accusations.md
Richard Jewell (Atlanta, 1996)
Case study — no reporter citation · No court decision — never charged · Cleared by U.S. Attorney's letter, October 26, 1996
A security guard who found the Centennial Olympic Park bomb and helped clear the area became a media suspect after a leak of the FBI's focus on him; he was never charged, was cleared by letter on October 26, 1996 after 88 days, and received an apology from Attorney General Janet Reno in July 1997. He settled libel claims with NBC (which agreed to pay $500,000), CNN, the New York Post, and Piedmont College (undisclosed amounts); his suit against the Atlanta Journal-Constitution ultimately failed. The actual bomber, Eric Rudolph, pleaded guilty in April 2005.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-defending-against-false-accusations.md
Wave 4-N — Coming Home
Gagnon v. Scarpelli
411 U.S. 778 · U.S. Supreme Court · May 14, 1973
Morrissey's preliminary and final revocation hearings extend to probationers; appointed counsel is decided case by case, with a presumption where the person raises a timely, colorable claim of innocence or substantial mitigation, and any refusal of counsel must appear in the record; affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-coming-home-criminal-facility.md · le-supporting-reentry.md
Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 29, 1972
Parole revocation requires due process — written notice, disclosure of evidence, an opportunity to be heard, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement of findings; reversed and remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio:
Taught in: adult-coming-home-criminal-facility.md · le-supporting-reentry.md
Wave 4-O/Q — Teen Life & Law
Commonwealth v. Levesque
436 Mass. 443, 766 N.E.2d 50 · Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts · March 29, 2002 (argued January 10, 2002 — dates from the opinion header, Docket No. SJC-08646, as reproduced by vLex)
The SJC reversed the dismissal of involuntary-manslaughter indictments: a person who creates a dangerous situation has a duty to take reasonable care to prevent the harm, and a wanton or reckless failure to act on that duty can support manslaughter — here, failing to report a fire the defendants accidentally started, which killed six Worcester firefighters.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: youth-never-leave-anyone-stranded.md
McGuiggan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
398 Mass. 152 · Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts · August 6, 1986
A social host who furnishes alcohol can be liable where they serve a guest they knew or should have known was intoxicated, who then negligently operates a vehicle and injures a third person; on these facts the hosts were not liable — there was no evidence they knew or should have known the guest was intoxicated — and summary judgment for the hosts was affirmed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: youth-parties-drugs-and-drinking.md
Texas v. Brown
460 U.S. 730 · Supreme Court of the United States · April 19, 1983 (argued January 12, 1983 — dates from the syllabus in the U.S. Reports)
Plain-view seizure upheld — an officer who lawfully sees contraband in plain sight inside a car has not conducted a "search"; "immediately apparent" means probable cause, not certainty.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: youth-cars-private-places-and-the-law.md
Wave 4-S — Foundations of Daily Life
Plyler v. Doe
457 U.S. 202 · U.S. Supreme Court · June 15, 1982
Texas statute withholding education funds for, and authorizing exclusion of, children not legally admitted violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; judgments affirmed.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-new-americans.md · youth-new-americans.md
Reuter v. City of Methuen
489 Mass. 465 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · April 4, 2022
Late-paid wages are "lost wages" under the Wage Act — the employer owed treble the late wages (not merely trebled interest), plus attorney's fees and costs; remanded.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-workplace-rights.md
Wave 4-T — Deaf Rights & Access
Bahl v. County of Ramsey
695 F.3d 778 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · October 9, 2012
Affirmed in part, reversed in part — summary judgment for the City affirmed on the traffic stop and the written charge statement; reversed and remanded on the post-arrest interview claim, where a jury could find the interview was stopped because of Bahl's disability and interpreter cost alone, without the regulatory undue-burden showing (28 C.F.R. § 35.164), was no answer.
📄 Court document · 🎥 Video/audio: none verified
Taught in: adult-sign-language-rights-and-respect.md
Laws & Codes
5 U.S.C. § 552
the Freedom of Information Act: federal agency records disclosure and its exemptions.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Records Departments in All Roles.
5 U.S.C. § 552a
the Privacy Act: federal agency record duties and individual access/amendment rights.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Fingerprinting · PII — Personally Identifiable Information.
15 U.S.C. § 45
FTC Act § 5: unfair or deceptive acts or practices; the enforcement text real consumer cases arise under.
Topics: The Attorney General's Office (Adult) · The Better Business Bureau.
18 U.S.C. § 1028
federal crimes involving identification documents and another person's means of identification.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: PII — Personally Identifiable Information.
18 U.S.C. § 1030
the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, including the computer-extortion prong, § 1030(a)(7).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Ransomware Attacks.
18 U.S.C. § 1111
federal murder.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Homicide · Murder.
18 U.S.C. § 1112
federal manslaughter.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Homicide · Manslaughter.
20 U.S.C. § 1092(f)
Clery Act campus safety disclosures, as amended by the Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024) to add hazing statistics and transparency reporting.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Hazing and Prevention.
22 U.S.C. § 211a
the Passport Act: the Secretary of State's authority to grant and revoke passports.
Topics: The State Department.
26 U.S.C. § 61
gross income defined.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Taxes.
26 U.S.C. § 7201
tax evasion.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Taxes.
28 U.S.C. § 534
federal collection and exchange of identification records.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Fingerprinting.
29 U.S.C. § 794
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: disability nondiscrimination by federal-funding recipients.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Inpatient and Outpatient.
42 U.S.C. §§ 401–434
Social Security Title II: retirement, disability, and survivors benefits.
Topics: Social Security.
42 U.S.C. § 12132
ADA Title II: discrimination ban for public entities.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Inpatient and Outpatient.
42 U.S.C. § 1381
Supplemental Security Income: purpose and eligibility frame.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Social Security.
42 U.S.C. § 1395dd
EMTALA: emergency-department medical screening and stabilization duties.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: The Intake Process in All Roles.
16 C.F.R. Part 314
the FTC Safeguards Rule: written information security programs for financial institutions.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Data Breaches.
20 C.F.R. Part 404
Social Security Administration regulations for Title II (OASDI) benefits.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Social Security.
42 C.F.R. Part 2
confidentiality of substance use disorder treatment records.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Addictions · Rehabs · Detox.
45 C.F.R. § 164.502
HIPAA: general rules for uses and disclosures of health information.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Counseling vs Therapy · Detox.
45 C.F.R. § 164.508
HIPAA: when a signed authorization is required.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Counseling vs Therapy.
45 C.F.R. § 164.524
HIPAA: the individual's right of access to their own health records.
Read it on the publisher’s site · Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Records Departments in All Roles.
45 C.F.R. §§ 164.400–414
HIPAA breach notification for unsecured protected health information.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Data Breaches.
105 CMR 400.300
Massachusetts sanitary code enforcement provision taught with the Board of Health unit (with 105 CMR 410, the housing standards, taught in the same unit).
Topics: The Board of Health.
201 CMR 17.00
Massachusetts data-security standards and the written information security program (WISP).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: PII — Personally Identifiable Information.
Massachusetts Constitution, Article 89
the Home Rule Amendment: local self-government powers.
Topics: State Government vs City Government and Districts and Ranks.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 167
CORI Act definitions.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Fingerprinting · Records Departments in All Roles.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 172
CORI access tiers and applicant record rights.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Fingerprinting.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 12
the Attorney General's office and duties (chapter).
Topics: The Attorney General's Office.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 34B, § 12
county government provision taught in the state-vs-city units.
Topics: State Government vs City Government and Districts and Ranks.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 43
city government plans (charters).
Topics: State Government vs City Government and Districts and Ranks.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 62, § 4
Massachusetts income tax rates.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Taxes.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 66, § 10
the Public Records Law: requests, the records access officer, timelines, fees.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Records Departments in All Roles.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A, § 2
unfair or deceptive acts or practices (the Massachusetts consumer protection law).
Topics: The Attorney General's Office · The Better Business Bureau.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93H, § 3
Massachusetts data breach notification duties.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Data Breaches.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111, § 31
local boards of health: powers and regulations.
Topics: The Board of Health.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111, § 70E
patients' rights, including records duties in care facilities.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Records Departments in All Roles.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111, § 127A
the State Sanitary Code and its enforcement.
Topics: The Board of Health.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111E, § 2
the division of drug rehabilitation (treatment system definitions).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Addictions · Rehabs · Detox.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111E, § 18
patient rights and records in drug rehabilitation facilities.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Rehabs · Detox.
Laws & Codes — Wave 4 additions (consolidated October 22, 2026)
18 U.S.C. § 1961
RICO definitions, including § 1961(4) "enterprise" and the § 1961(5) pattern floor (related predicate acts plus continuity).
Topics: Racketeering and RICO.
18 U.S.C. § 1963
RICO criminal penalties: imprisonment up to 20 years (or life where a predicate carries life), mandatory forfeiture, and an alternative fine up to twice gross profits.
Topics: Racketeering and RICO.
18 U.S.C. § 1964(c)
the private civil RICO action (treble damages for injury to business or property from the predicate acts; no prior criminal conviction or separate "racketeering injury" required).
Topics: Racketeering and RICO.
18 U.S.C. § 1203
hostage taking (a basis of the counts in United States v. Yunis, its text quoted in the opinion).
Topics: Traveling by Air · Traveling by Sea and Land.
18 U.S.C. § 1651
piracy under the law of nations: "Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life.".
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
49 U.S.C. ch. 465
Special Aircraft Jurisdiction of the United States: § 46501 definitions; § 46502 aircraft piracy; § 46503 interference with security screening personnel; § 46504 interference with flight crew; § 46505 carrying a weapon or explosive on an aircraft; § 46506 application of certain criminal laws to acts on aircraft; § 46507 false information and threats.
Topics: Traveling by Air.
46 U.S.C. § 30104
the Jones Act negligence action for injured seamen.
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
46 U.S.C. § 30302
the Death on the High Seas Act cause of action.
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
46 U.S.C. § 30106
the 3-year time limit for maritime personal-injury and death actions.
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
46 U.S.C. § 3507
passenger vessel security and safety requirements (Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act of 2010), including the log-book and FBI-reporting duties at subsection (g).
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
28 U.S.C. § 1333
federal district courts' admiralty and maritime jurisdiction.
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
8 U.S.C. § 1324
bringing in and harboring certain aliens (smuggling, transporting, harboring, encouraging; per-person penalties).
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
19 U.S.C. § 482
customs search authority (relied on by the Court in United States v. Ramsey).
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
18 U.S.C. § 2511
intentional interception, use, or disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited; the § 2511(2)(d) one-party-consent provision.
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance.
18 U.S.C. § 2515
the contents of unlawfully intercepted communications, and evidence derived from them, are barred from use in any proceeding.
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance.
18 U.S.C. § 2516
who may authorize or apply for an interception order, and the listed predicate offenses.
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance.
18 U.S.C. § 2518
Title III procedure: senior-official approval, probable cause, necessity, particularity, the 30-day limit, minimization, sealing, and later notice; suppression at § 2518(10)(a).
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance.
18 U.S.C. § 2520
the private civil action for unlawful interception: damages as the greater of (actual damages plus the violator's profits) or statutory damages (the greater of $100 per day of violation or $10,000), punitive damages in appropriate cases, and a reasonable attorney's fee.
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance.
18 U.S.C. § 2703
Stored Communications Act disclosure rules, including § 2703(d) "specific and articulable facts" orders and the § 2703(f) 90-day preservation duty (renewable once).
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance · Hidden Technology in the Home.
18 U.S.C. § 2519
the Wiretap Reports: the annual reporting mechanism for interception orders (taught in one line in the Law Enforcement wiretapping unit).
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance.
34 U.S.C. § 12601
pattern-or-practice conduct by law enforcement depriving persons of constitutional rights is unlawful; the Attorney General may sue for equitable and declaratory relief (enacted Pub. L. 103-322 § 210401 (1994); formerly 42 U.S.C. § 14141).
Topics: Presumption of Innocence and Racial Profiling.
42 U.S.C. § 2000a
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title II: the prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation.
Topics: Ending Racism.
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII: unlawful employment practices (the statute construed in Griggs v. Duke Power Co.).
Topics: Ending Racism · Workplace Rights.
42 U.S.C. § 2000d
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI: no discrimination under federally assisted programs (the Harvard holding in Students for Fair Admissions runs through Title VI, which is coextensive with equal protection).
Topics: Ending Racism.
52 U.S.C. § 10301
Voting Rights Act § 2: the nationwide ban on voting qualifications or practices that result in denial or abridgement of the right to vote on account of race or color (totality-of-circumstances test).
Topics: Ending Racism.
52 U.S.C. § 10304
Voting Rights Act § 5: preclearance — covered jurisdictions may not enforce a voting change unless and until it is precleared.
Topics: Ending Racism.
52 U.S.C. § 10303
Voting Rights Act § 4(b): the coverage formula held unconstitutional in Shelby County v. Holder; the formula may no longer be used, leaving § 5 without an operating coverage formula unless Congress enacts a new one.
Topics: Ending Racism.
42 U.S.C. § 3604
the Fair Housing Act: discrimination in the sale or rental of housing and other prohibited practices (the statute construed in Inclusive Communities; also taught in Coming Home and Housing Stability).
Topics: Ending Racism · Coming Home — Criminal Facility · Housing Stability.
42 U.S.C. § 1981
equal rights under the law, including the right to make and enforce contracts (Reconstruction-era statute, Civil Rights Act of 1866 as re-enacted).
Topics: Ending Racism.
42 U.S.C. § 1983
the civil action for deprivation of constitutional rights under color of state law (the vehicle for Glik's own suit; also taught with Garrity and in the healing wave's custody-care unit).
Topics: Ending Racism · Defending Against False Accusations · Collecting and Filing Evidence Offline · Healing and Recovery (custody care).
18 U.S.C. § 242
criminal deprivation of rights under color of law.
Topics: Ending Racism.
18 U.S.C. § 249
hate crime acts (Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act), including the lynching-conspiracy paragraphs added in 2022 by the Emmett Till Antilynching Act, Pub. L. 117-107 (an amendment to § 249(a), not a freestanding code section).
Topics: Ending Racism.
28 U.S.C. § 2254
federal habeas corpus review of state convictions; subsection (d) (AEDPA) bars relief unless the state decision was contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, or rested on an unreasonable determination of the facts.
Topics: Capital Punishment and Execution.
42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)
Prison Litigation Reform Act exhaustion: no federal conditions action until available administrative remedies are exhausted (as discussed in Porter v. Clarke itself).
Topics: Death Row, Solitary and General Population.
18 U.S.C. § 5043
juvenile room confinement in federal custody (First Step Act § 613): only as a temporary response to behavior posing a serious and immediate risk of physical harm, after less-restrictive techniques, with release when the juvenile becomes calm and a 3-hour ceiling.
Topics: Death Row, Solitary and General Population.
42 U.S.C. § 12182
ADA Title III public accommodations, including § 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii) auxiliary aids and services.
Topics: Learning to Sign — Rights & Respect.
42 U.S.C. § 12112
ADA employment discrimination and reasonable accommodation.
Topics: Coming Home — Medical Facility.
42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
the Americans with Disabilities Act's findings and purpose (§ 12101) and definitions (§ 12102), read in full text.
Topics: Rehabilitation in All Forms.
29 U.S.C. § 1185a
the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA): mental health and substance use benefit limits generally may not be less favorable than medical/surgical limits.
Topics: Healing Without Medication · Rehabilitation in All Forms · Rehabilitation and Reentry.
29 U.S.C. § 720 et seq.
Rehabilitation Act Title I: the federal-state vocational rehabilitation program, informed choice, and the Individualized Plan for Employment.
Topics: Rehabilitation in All Forms.
29 U.S.C. § 2612
the Family and Medical Leave Act leave entitlement.
Topics: Coming Home — Medical Facility.
34 U.S.C. § 60501
Second Chance Act purposes and findings.
Topics: Coming Home — Criminal Facility · Supporting Reentry.
15 U.S.C. § 1681b
the Fair Credit Reporting Act's permissible-purposes section: written authorization before an employment report, and the § 1681b(b)(3) pre-adverse-action → waiting → adverse-action sequence.
Topics: Background Checks — Know Your Own Record · Background Checks — The Lawful Way.
18 U.S.C. § 1039
a federal crime to obtain, sell, or buy confidential phone records by pretexting.
Topics: Background Checks — Know Your Own Record.
18 U.S.C. §§ 2721–2725
the Driver's Privacy Protection Act: § 2721 bars disclosure of personal information from motor-vehicle records except for its listed permissible uses, beginning with government agencies, including law enforcement, carrying out their functions.
Topics: Background Checks — The Lawful Way.
42 U.S.C. § 1994
the Peonage Act of 1867: abolishes peonage and voids laws enforcing labor in liquidation of a debt.
Topics: Ending Slavery in All Its Forms.
18 U.S.C. § 1589
forced labor: obtaining labor by force, threats of serious harm, abuse of legal process, or a coercive scheme (the modern statute Congress enacted past Kozminski's narrower reading).
Topics: Ending Slavery in All Its Forms.
18 U.S.C. § 1591
sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and of minors, for whom no proof of those means is required.
Topics: Ending Slavery in All Its Forms.
21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(7)
distributing a controlled substance or analogue to a person without their knowledge, with intent to commit a crime of violence (18 U.S.C. § 16, including rape): imprisonment up to 20 years plus fine.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
18 U.S.C. § 1343
wire fraud (the Phones & Internet unit's single code; no case taught there).
Topics: Phones and Internet Without Fear.
8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(4)
the public-charge ground of inadmissibility (INA § 212(a)(4)).
Topics: New Americans.
42 U.S.C. § 18116
Affordable Care Act § 1557: language access and free interpreter services (taught with the HHS Office for Civil Rights language-access pages).
Topics: Health Navigation Basics.
45 C.F.R. Part 46, Subpart C
additional protections for prisoners as research subjects: § 46.302 purpose ("truly voluntary and uncoerced decision"); § 46.303(c) "prisoner" defined (including pretrial detainees); § 46.304 IRB composition; § 46.305(a) required findings, including the inducement limit at (a)(2), fair selection at (a)(4), and the parole rule at (a)(6); § 46.306(a)(2) the four permitted categories of research.
Topics: Prisoners as Research Subjects.
14 C.F.R. Part 250
oversales: § 250.5 denied-boarding compensation (200% of one-way fare capped at $1,075 for a 1–2 hour substitute arrival, domestic; 400% capped at $2,150 over 2 hours; the international window is 1–4 hours for the 200% tier); § 250.9 written explanation.
Topics: Traveling by Air.
14 C.F.R. Part 259
enhanced protections for airline passengers: the tarmac-delay deplaning opportunity (3 hours domestic / 4 hours international) with food and water by 2 hours, and DOT's 2024 automatic-refund rule for canceled or significantly changed flights.
Topics: Traveling by Air.
14 C.F.R. Part 254
domestic baggage liability: a DOT-adjusted cap exists and the rule states it; no dollar figure is taught (the current cap was not confirmed at an official DOT source during the build).
Topics: Traveling by Air.
49 C.F.R. § 1560.205
the Secure Flight redress process through DHS TRIP.
Topics: Traveling by Air.
21 C.F.R. § 880.6300
the implantable radiofrequency transponder system is a Class II medical device (the FDA device classification behind the VeriChip clearance).
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
28 C.F.R. § 35.160
the ADA Title II communication rule: (a)(1) the as-effective standard; (b)(2) primary consideration plus the nature/length/complexity factors; (d) video remote interpreting (VRI) performance standards.
Topics: Learning to Sign — Rights & Respect.
28 C.F.R. § 36.303
ADA Title III auxiliary aids and services: (b)(1) the aids list; (c) the entity's choice stands only if communication is actually effective; (f) VRI standards.
Topics: Learning to Sign — Rights & Respect.
34 C.F.R. § 300.324(a)(2)(iv)
IDEA: IEP teams must consider a deaf or hard-of-hearing child's communication needs, including direct communication with peers and professionals in the child's own language and mode.
Topics: Learning to Sign — Rights & Respect.
47 C.F.R. § 79.1
the FCC closed-captioning rule (100% of new nonexempt English/Spanish programming; quality standards at § 79.1(j)(2)).
Topics: Learning to Sign — Rights & Respect.
42 C.F.R. § 482.43
the Medicare discharge-planning Condition of Participation.
Topics: Coming Home — Medical Facility.
42 C.F.R. § 405.1205
the Important Message from Medicare (discharge-appeal notice).
Topics: Coming Home — Medical Facility.
45 C.F.R. § 302.56
the child-support guidelines rule; subsection (c)(3) provides that incarceration may not be treated as voluntary unemployment.
Topics: Coming Home — Criminal Facility.
34 C.F.R. § 106.40(b)
Title IX: no discrimination against or exclusion of any student from any program, class, or activity on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination, or recovery; pregnancy is treated like any other temporary disability, with medically necessary leave and reinstatement to prior status.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
16 C.F.R. Part 453
the FTC Funeral Rule (Funeral Industry Practices): funeral providers must give a General Price List on request (§ 453.2(b)(4)), give itemized prices and an itemized written statement of the goods and services selected (§ 453.2(b)(5)), give price information by telephone (§ 453.2(b)(1)), may not misrepresent that law requires embalming (§ 453.3(a)), and may not refuse or charge a fee to handle a casket bought elsewhere; alternative containers must be available for cremation.
Topics: Death and Grief.
8 C.F.R. § 316.2
naturalization eligibility.
Topics: New Americans.
FCC SIM-swap / port-out fraud rules (2023)
carriers must use secure customer-authentication methods not based on readily available biographical or account information, and must immediately notify customers of SIM-change and port-out requests. No C.F.R. pinpoint is carried in the wave record.
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance.
603 CMR 23.00
the Massachusetts student-records regulation: protects student-record confidentiality. (Carried in the Wave 4-N resource records.).
Topics: Coming Home — Going Back (Youth).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 271A, §§ 1–2
the Massachusetts enterprise-crime chapter, limited by § 2 to enterprises engaged in or affecting licensed gaming: § 1 definitions ("pattern of criminal enterprise activity" = at least 3 interrelated incidents, the last within 5 years of another); § 2 penalty up to 15 years and/or $25,000.
Topics: Racketeering and RICO.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99
Massachusetts interception law: "interception" means secretly hearing or recording wire or oral communications without the prior authority of all parties; willful interception punishable by a fine up to $10,000, state prison up to 5 years, or jail/house of correction up to 2½ years (para. C(1)); paragraph Q provides a civil remedy (actual damages not less than liquidated damages of $100 per day or $1,000, whichever is higher, plus punitive damages and a reasonable attorney's fee).
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance · Hidden Technology in the Home · When Someone Is Watching Your Phone (Youth, one plain sentence) · Collecting and Filing Evidence Offline.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 105
secretly photographing, videotaping, or electronically surveilling a person who is nude or partially nude, or sexual or other intimate parts under or around clothing, secretly and without knowledge and consent where privacy is reasonably expected (base offense up to 2½ years house of correction and/or $5,000; separate heavier dissemination and child provisions). Taught at this verified scope only — § 105 is not a general hidden-camera statute.
Topics: Hidden Technology in the Home.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 39
the Massachusetts hate-crime assault statute: assault or battery for purposes of intimidation — an assault, a battery, or property damage committed with intent to intimidate because of race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability, with enhanced punishment where bodily injury results. (A criminal hate-crime provision — NOT the general Massachusetts civil-rights act.).
Topics: Ending Racism.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B
Massachusetts' fair-employment / anti-discrimination chapter, enforced by the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD): § 4 lists the unlawful practices (employment — including § 4(9½), "ban the box": no criminal-history request on the initial written application, with narrow exceptions — housing, credit, and public accommodations discrimination) and § 5 sets the MCAD complaint procedure.
Topics: Ending Racism · Background Checks — Know Your Own Record · Housing Stability · Workplace Rights.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 268, § 13B
intimidation of witnesses, jurors, court and law-enforcement personnel, and others connected to proceedings.
Topics: Defending Against False Accusations · Collecting and Filing Evidence Offline.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 269, § 13A
knowingly making a false report of a crime to police officers.
Topics: Defending Against False Accusations.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 171A
CORI duties: a copy of the record before questioning and before an adverse decision, covering employment, housing, volunteer work, and licensing.
Topics: Coming Home — Criminal Facility.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 276, §§ 100A–100C
sealing of criminal records: § 100A waiting periods confirmed in the text as 3 years for a misdemeanor and 7 years for a felony, with the "no record" answer; § 100C non-conviction sealing.
Topics: Coming Home — Criminal Facility · Background Checks — Know Your Own Record.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111, § 236
the Massachusetts CARE Act (added by Acts of 2016, ch. 332): a patient may designate a caregiver (18+) to be documented in the medical record, notified of discharge, given a copy of the discharge plan, and taught the aftercare tasks by demonstration; the statute creates no duty to designate one or to perform tasks.
Topics: Coming Home — Medical Facility.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 190B, § 5-311
termination of guardianship on petition, notice, and hearing when the person is no longer incapacitated (Rogers orders are reviewed yearly and may be continued, amended, or dismissed).
Topics: Coming Home — Medical Facility.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 138, § 34
furnishing alcohol to a person under 21 is a crime (fine up to $2,000, imprisonment up to 1 year, or both); "furnish" includes allowing possession on premises or property the person owns or controls; the sole exception is the charged person's own children and grandchildren.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 138, § 34A
under-21 purchase or attempted purchase, arranging procurement, misrepresenting age, or falsifying ID: $300 fine, conviction reported to the RMV, and a 180-day license suspension.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 138, § 34C
under-21 knowing possession, transport, or carrying of alcohol (unaccompanied by a parent or guardian): fine up to $50 first offense, up to $150 subsequent; conviction reported to the RMV with a 90-day suspension; employment exception for ages 18–21.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 90, §§ 24, 24(1)(f)(2), 24P, 24G
the under-21 alcohol-and-driving penalty structure (as published by the RMV): a breath test of .02+ brings an immediate 30-day suspension; the Youth Alcohol Program suspension under § 24P runs consecutively (1 year under 18; 6 months ages 18–20); an under-21 first-offender refusal suspension runs 3 years; a first OUI conviction brings 1 year (or an alternative program disposition); motor vehicle homicide sits at § 24G; the structure reflects Melanie's Law (2005).
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 13A
assault, and assault and battery: up to 2½ years house of correction and/or up to $1,000 fine; § 13A(b) enhances to a felony (up to 5 years state prison / up to $5,000) for A&B causing serious bodily injury, A&B on a pregnant person knowing or having reason to know, and A&B on a person protected by an outstanding order.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 22
rape: sexual intercourse compelled by force and against the person's will, or by threat of bodily injury; § 22(b) up to 20 years; § 22(a) aggravated forms up to life; § 22(c) — a person in law-enforcement custody is deemed incapable of consent.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 23
rape and abuse of child: sexual intercourse with a child under 16 (state prison for life or any term) — the statutory basis for the Massachusetts age of consent, 16; a person under 16 cannot legally consent, consent is not a defense, and neither is a mistaken belief about age; the section carries no "Romeo and Juliet" exception.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Waves 4-O and 4-Q).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 3
drugging a person for sexual intercourse (administering or causing a drug, matter, or thing to be taken, intending to stupefy or overpower to enable intercourse): state prison for life or any term not less than 10 years.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 12R
abortion consent: a patient 16+ consents alone; under 16 and unmarried requires the patient's consent and one parent's or guardian's, unless a Superior Court judge authorizes on a confidential petition (maturity/informed consent, or best interests), with a right to appointed counsel and a confidential, expedited process; the 16-year line was set by the ROE Act (Acts of 2020, ch. 263).
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 12F
a minor who reasonably believes they have contracted or been exposed to a disease declared dangerous to the public health may consent to related medical or dental care — and, if sexually active, to care designed to prevent HIV infection; records of such care are confidential between the minor and the physician; consent under § 12F does not extend to abortion or sterilization.
Topics: Teen Life & Law, Part 2 (Wave 4-P) · Health Navigation Basics (Youth, outline).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 209A, § 1
"family or household members" includes persons who are or have been in a substantive dating or engagement relationship, so 209A orders can cover dating partners; "abuse" includes coercive control (added by 2024, ch. 118, effective September 18, 2024).
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 119, § 51A
mandated reporters with reasonable cause to believe a child suffers abuse or neglect (including sexual abuse, sexual exploitation, and trafficking) must communicate with DCF orally immediately and file a written report within 48 hours; any person may file a report.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 208, § 31
divorce custody: "the happiness and welfare of the children shall determine their custody"; defines sole legal custody, shared legal custody, sole physical custody, and shared physical custody.
Topics: Teen Life & Law, Part 2 (Wave 4-P).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 29B
disseminating visual material of a child under 18 engaging in sexual conduct: imprisonment 10 to 20 years.
Topics: Teen Life & Law, Part 2 (Wave 4-P).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 29C
knowing possession of visual material of a child under 18: up to 5 years (first offense; up to 10 for a subsequent offense).
Topics: Teen Life & Law, Part 2 (Wave 4-P).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 16
open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior: a felony (state prison up to 3 years, jail up to 2 years, or a fine up to $300); its judge-made elements include intentional exposure that would alarm or shock a reasonable person, and a viewer in fact alarmed or shocked.
Topics: Cars, Private Places and the Law (Wave 4-Q).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 53
penalty for certain offenses: § 53(a) includes indecent exposure (misdemeanor: up to 6 months and/or $200); § 53(b) covers disorderly persons and disturbers of the peace (first offense fine up to $150), with a proviso that an elementary or secondary school student shall not be adjudged delinquent under subsection (b) for such conduct in school settings.
Topics: Cars, Private Places and the Law (Wave 4-Q).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 120
trespass after being forbidden: entering or remaining in a dwelling, buildings, boats, improved or enclosed land, wharf, pier, or a school bus after being forbidden directly or by posted notice (fine up to $100 or imprisonment up to 30 days, or both; a person found committing the trespass may be arrested on the spot).
Topics: Cars, Private Places and the Law (Wave 4-Q).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 13L
wanton or reckless behavior creating a substantial risk of serious bodily injury or sexual abuse to a child, including a wanton or reckless failure to take reasonable steps to alleviate such a risk where there is a duty to act (house of correction up to 2½ years). Protects children under 18 only; no injury need actually occur.
Topics: Never Leave Anyone Stranded (Wave 4-Q).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 26
kidnapping: forcibly or secretly confining or imprisoning another person against their will, and related seizure and inveigling offenses (state prison up to 10 years, or a fine up to $1,000 and jail up to 2 years; enhancements exist and are not taught at Youth level beyond "punishments rise sharply").
Topics: Never Leave Anyone Stranded (Wave 4-Q).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 94C, § 34A
immunity for seeking medical assistance for a drug-related overdose (Good Samaritan): a person who in good faith seeks medical assistance, and the person experiencing the overdose, are shielded from possession charges and related supervision violations on evidence gained from the call; trafficking and distribution are not shielded; good-faith naloxone receipt, possession, and administration are protected.
Topics: Teen Life & Law (Wave 4-O) · Never Leave Anyone Stranded (Wave 4-Q) · Family Side of Addiction (Wave 4-S).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 94C, § 19B
the statewide naloxone standing order.
Topics: Family Side of Addiction (Wave 4-S).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 114
Cemeteries and Burials (chapter, taught in outline): § 34 — no land not already so used may be used for burial without permission of the town (or the mayor and aldermen of the city), and no permission may be given until the board of health has approved the location in writing after notice and a hearing.
Topics: Death and Grief.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 46
Return and Registry of Births, Marriages and Deaths (chapter, taught in outline — the statutory home of the death certificate): § 2 requires separate indexes of births, marriages, and deaths and preservation of all returns for examination.
Topics: Death and Grief.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 38
the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (chapter): § 2 creates the office and provides for district medical examiners; § 3 makes it the duty of any person with knowledge of a death in the listed circumstances (including deaths where criminal violence appears, deaths in custody, and any person found dead) to notify the office immediately, with a fine of not more than $500 for specified professionals who fail to report.
Topics: Death and Grief.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 221C
the Massachusetts court-interpreter law (interpreters for all court events; ASL/deaf-and-hard-of-hearing assignment through the Massachusetts Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing; free; ask early — as described on the Trial Court Office of Language Access page).
Topics: Learning to Sign — Rights & Respect.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 90, § 63
the RMV collects race/age/gender, infraction, search, and outcome data from every Uniform Citation; if a public analysis suggests an agency appears to have engaged in racial or gender profiling, the Secretary (with the Attorney General) may require one year of reason-for-stop collection on all stops and mandate implicit-bias training; § 63(h) prohibits racial or other profiling with a specific-suspect-description exception.
Topics: Presumption of Innocence and Racial Profiling.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 19B
the Massachusetts lie-detector law: unlawful to require such a test as a condition of employment, expressly including police-officer applicants; exception for law-enforcement criminal investigations.
Topics: Background Checks — The Lawful Way.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 276, § 100B
sealing of juvenile (delinquency) records: a person may ask the Commissioner of Probation to seal a record of delinquency court appearances, generally once the case has been closed at least three years and the statute's conditions are met; sealed records are reported as "no record" to most who ask (taught in outline only).
Topics: Your Footprint and Your First Record (Youth).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 119, § 60A
delinquency records are withheld from public inspection.
Topics: Your Footprint and Your First Record (Youth).
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 50
trafficking in persons for sexual servitude (definitions at § 49, cited in the Law Enforcement unit's Sources).
Topics: Ending Slavery in All Its Forms.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 51
trafficking in persons for forced services.
Topics: Ending Slavery in All Its Forms.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 186, § 15B
security deposits and last month's rent: deposit cap, separate account, receipts, 5% interest, 30-day return, and treble damages under § 15B(7).
Topics: Housing Stability.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 186, § 14
quiet enjoyment; penalties for self-help eviction.
Topics: Housing Stability.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111, § 127L
repair and deduct: certified violations, 5/14-day owner windows, and a four-months'-rent cap.
Topics: Housing Stability.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 239, § 8A
the rent-withholding defense and counterclaim in summary process.
Topics: Housing Stability.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 148
wage payment timing, including final pay (facts rest on the Attorney General's official "Pay and recordkeeping" guide at mass.gov — the direct malegislature.gov open failed during the build; see the carried-forward exclusions).
Topics: Workplace Rights.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 148B
the employee-misclassification three-part test.
Topics: Workplace Rights.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 150
the Wage Act remedy: mandatory treble damages plus attorney's fees (the section applied in Reuter v. City of Methuen).
Topics: Workplace Rights.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, §§ 100–101
meal breaks.
Topics: Workplace Rights.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151, § 1
the Massachusetts minimum wage: $15.00 per hour, effective January 1, 2023 (service rate $6.75/hour under its conditions, per the Attorney General's guide; checked October 21, 2026).
Topics: Workplace Rights.
Chapter 120 of the Acts of 2017 (Massachusetts ACCESS Law)
contraceptive coverage without cost-sharing, including a 12-month supply (two categories are excluded from no-cost coverage per MassHealth guidance: male condoms and vasectomies).
Topics: Birth Control and Methods.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 — Pub. L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241 (signed July 2, 1964)
the federal statute outlawing discrimination in public accommodations, employment (Title VII, enforced by the EEOC, which the Act created), and federally funded programs.
Topics: How to Bring Positive Change to Countries and States.
Clean Air Act (1970, as amended) — cited by name only
the federal air-pollution statute, taught as the long-arc reform example (EPA's own accounting reports the six common pollutants' combined emissions down 78% from 1970 to 2020). No U.S. Code or Public Law number was verified by opening during the build, so the Act is cited by name and year only.
Topics: How to Bring Positive Change to Countries and States.
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (education provisions)
the education rights of students experiencing homelessness, taught via the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Topics: Housing Stability.
U.S. Const. amend. IV
protection against unreasonable searches and seizures; warrants only on probable cause.
Topics: Wiretapping and Illegal Surveillance · Presumption of Innocence and Racial Profiling · Background Checks — The Lawful Way (the constitutional floor).
U.S. Const. amend. V
"nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.".
Topics: The Right to Remain Silent · Ending Racism (equal-protection component).
U.S. Const. amend. VI
jury trial and counsel guarantees.
Topics: Judicial Systems — USA vs the World.
U.S. Const. amend. VIII
bail set above an amount reasonably calculated to assure the defendant's appearance is "excessive" (Stack v. Boyle).
Topics: Presumption of Innocence and Racial Profiling.
U.S. Const. amend. XIII
abolishes slavery and involuntary servitude except as punishment for crime, and gives Congress enforcement power.
Topics: Ending Racism · Ending Slavery in All Its Forms.
U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1
citizenship, due process, and equal protection against the states.
Topics: Presumption of Innocence and Racial Profiling · Ending Racism.
U.S. Const. amend. XV
the right to vote shall not be denied or abridged on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Topics: Ending Racism.
U.S. Const. art. III
the federal judicial power (the text at issue in Marbury v. Madison).
Topics: Judicial Systems — USA vs the World.
Federal Rule of Evidence 901
authenticating or identifying evidence: the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.
Topics: Collecting and Filing Evidence Offline.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e)
failure to preserve electronically stored information: curative measures for prejudice, and the severest sanctions only on a finding of intent to deprive.
Topics: Collecting and Filing Evidence Offline.
725 ILCS 5/103-2.2
Illinois SB 2122 (2021), the first state statute of its kind: a juvenile's confession obtained through knowing deception is presumptively inadmissible.
Topics: The Right to Remain Silent.
625 ILCS 5/11-212
the Illinois Traffic and Pedestrian Stop Statistical Study.
Topics: Presumption of Innocence and Racial Profiling.
Oregon SB 418 (2021)
a youth statement obtained through intentionally false information is presumed involuntary (per Oregon Legislature summaries).
Topics: The Right to Remain Silent.
California AB 2644 (2022)
approved and filed September 13, 2022, operative January 1, 2024: bars threats, deception, and manipulative tactics in custodial interrogation of youth.
Topics: The Right to Remain Silent.
California Racial and Identity Profiling Act (AB 953)
annual stop-data reporting to the Attorney General.
Topics: Presumption of Innocence and Racial Profiling.
New York HALT Act
signed March 31, 2021, effective March 31, 2022: "segregated confinement" defined as more than 17 hours a day in cell; capped at 15 consecutive days / 20 days in any 60; banned for people 21 and under, 55 and over, pregnant people, and people with disabilities; Residential Rehabilitation Units beyond the caps; representation at hearings. (A New York court found routine DOCCS violations in June 2024; implementation remains contested.).
Topics: Death Row, Solitary and General Population.
California Civil Code § 52.7 (SB 362, Ch. 538, 2007)
no person may require, coerce, or compel another to undergo subcutaneous implanting of an identification device; civil penalty up to $10,000 plus $1,000/day; private action for damages.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Wisconsin Stat. § 146.25 (2005 Wisconsin Act 482, 2006)
"No person may require an individual to undergo the implanting of a microchip"; forfeiture up to $10,000, each day a separate offence. The first state ban.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Missouri § 285.035 (2008)
no employer shall require an employee to have personal identification microchip technology implanted; violation is a Class A misdemeanor.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
63 Okla. Stat. § 1-1430 (Laws 2008, c. 337)
no person, governmental entity, or corporate entity may require an individual to undergo the implanting of a microchip or permanent mark; fine up to $10,000.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Ark. Code § 11-5-501 (Acts 2019, No. 516)
an employer shall not require an implant as a condition of employment, coerce, create a hostile environment over refusal, or withhold advancement; implants only with written consent; removal within 30 days on request; employer pays costs; data use disclosed.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Montana Code Ann. § 39-2-1502 (Ch. 324, L. 2019)
an employer may not require implantation as a condition of employment; written-consent pathway; removal within 30 days on request and within 30 days of termination; employer pays implantation/removal and injury costs; data disclosure; data transmission to the employer ceases at termination.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.870 (AB 226, 2019)
unlawful for a state officer/employee, an employer as a condition of employment, an insurer, or a bail licensee to require another person to undergo implantation of a microchip or other permanent identification marker; Category C felony. Voluntary election expressly not prohibited.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
N.D. Century Code § 12.1-15-06 (signed April 2007)
ban on required implantation (violation treated as a Class A misdemeanor in secondary sources). QUALIFIED: membership in the verified thirteen-state list is verified; the official ndlegis.gov text was NOT opened during the build, so the units never quote its wording.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Colorado HB 24-1058 (2024)
amended the Colorado Privacy Act: "biological data" and "neural data" are sensitive data requiring opt-in consent and a data protection assessment (signed April 17, 2024; effective August 6, 2024). The first U.S. state to extend a comprehensive privacy law to neural data.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Thirteen-state mandatory-implant ban list (2024 count)
Arkansas, California, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah, Wisconsin, Indiana, Alabama, Mississippi (2024 Carnegie Council count, citing Bloomberg Law); Washington enacted an employer-focused law in 2026 (HB 2303, signed March 11, 2026, effective June 11, 2026). Individual statute records in this index cover eight of the thirteen; New Hampshire, Utah, Indiana, Alabama, and Mississippi are named in the verified list only, with no individual statute record in this wave.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Charter of the United Nations (1945)
signed June 26, 1945, in force October 24, 1945: Article 2(1) sovereign equality; Article 7 principal organs including the International Court of Justice; Article 23 Security Council composition.
Topics: Governments and International Law.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998)
adopted July 17, 1998; entered into force July 1, 2002; 125 states parties as of January 2025 (taught as "more than 120"); four core crimes (genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, aggression); complementarity (Art. 17).
Topics: Governments and International Law.
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963)
the consular-notification duty (Article 36), taught at outline level in the comparative units and with Article 36 in the New Americans units.
Topics: Governments and International Law · Judicial Systems — USA vs the World · New Americans.
United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000)
named at outline level only in the Law Enforcement governments unit.
Topics: Governments and International Law.
Chicago Convention — Convention on International Civil Aviation (1944)
state sovereignty over national airspace (Article 1); aircraft nationality by registration; created the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
Topics: Traveling by Air.
Tokyo Convention — Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft (1963)
jurisdiction of the state of registry over acts aboard aircraft; the aircraft commander's authority to restrain, deliver, or disembark; the landing state's duties.
Topics: Traveling by Air.
Hague Convention — Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft (1970)
aircraft hijacking: states must make it punishable by severe penalties and must prosecute or extradite an offender found in their territory.
Topics: Traveling by Air.
Montreal Convention 1971 — Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Civil Aviation
sabotage and other unlawful acts against civil aviation safety, on the same prosecute-or-extradite model as the Hague Convention.
Topics: Traveling by Air.
Montreal Convention 1999 — Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (MC99)
airline liability to passengers in international carriage; ICAO-revised limits effective December 28, 2024 (death or bodily injury 151,880 SDR; passenger delay 6,303 SDR; baggage 1,519 SDR per passenger; cargo 26 SDR per kilogram).
Topics: Traveling by Air.
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982)
maritime zones and jurisdiction (internal waters; territorial sea to 12 nautical miles with innocent passage; contiguous zone to 24; exclusive economic zone to 200; the high seas; the definition of piracy at Article 101). The United States is not a party but treats its navigation and jurisdiction provisions as customary international law.
Topics: Traveling by Sea and Land.
UN Nelson Mandela Rules (2015 revision), Rules 43–45
Rule 43 prohibits indefinite and prolonged solitary confinement; Rule 44 defines solitary as 22+ hours a day without meaningful human contact and "prolonged" as more than 15 consecutive days; Rule 45 limits solitary to exceptional cases as a last resort for the shortest time, under independent review, and never by virtue of a prisoner's sentence.
Topics: Death Row, Solitary and General Population.
UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (1997), Article 11
practices contrary to human dignity, such as reproductive cloning of human beings, shall not be permitted. A declaration — not binding law.
Topics: Human Cloning.
United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning (GA Res. 59/280, 2005)
member states called upon to prohibit all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity and the protection of human life. Expressly non-binding.
Topics: Human Cloning.
Council of Europe — Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings (ETS No. 168, 1998)
Article 1 prohibits any intervention seeking to create a human being genetically identical to another; Article 2 allows no derogation. In force March 1, 2001, for its parties — the first and only binding international instrument in this area.
Topics: Human Cloning.
GDPR — Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Article 4(1)
an identification number and linked records are personal data; health data is a special category; no EU-wide implant ban exists, and implant data is governed through the GDPR.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Canada — Assisted Human Reproduction Act, S.C. 2004, c. 2, § 5(1)(a)
ban-all: no person shall knowingly create a human clone by using any technique, or transplant a human clone into a human being or any non-human life form or artificial device.
Topics: Human Cloning.
Germany — Embryo Protection Act (Embryonenschutzgesetz, 1990), § 6
ban-all: causing a human embryo to develop artificially with the same genetic information as another is punishable by up to five years' imprisonment or a fine; transferring such an embryo to a woman is likewise punishable; attempt is punishable.
Topics: Human Cloning.
United Kingdom — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (as amended) and the 2008 framework
reproductive cloning prohibited (the Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001 offence continues within the 2008 framework after the 2001 Act's 2009 repeal); research cloning is licensed project-by-project by the HFEA (listed purposes, consent required, no transfer to a woman, 14-day limit).
Topics: Human Cloning.
Australia — Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction Act 2002
reproductive cloning prohibited absolutely; creating or developing an embryo other than by fertilisation is an offence unless authorised by licence; embryo development outside a woman beyond 14 days is an offence.
Topics: Human Cloning.
Chile — Law No. 21.383 (2021)
amended Article 19 of the Chilean Constitution to protect neurorights, safeguarding brain activity and information derived from it; the first country to do so at constitutional level (the law applied in Girardi v. Emotiv).
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
United States (federal) — human cloning: no federal statute
no federal statute bans human cloning; the FDA asserts jurisdiction over clinical research using cloning technology to create a human being (letter, October 26, 1998: an Investigational New Drug application must be in effect, with IRB approval and informed consent, and the FDA stated it would not permit such an investigation to proceed until major safety questions are resolved); separate federal policies restrict federal funding.
Topics: Human Cloning.
United States (states) — human cloning statutes, dated snapshot
from the dated 2015 fifty-state survey taught AS DATED (never as a standing census): 7 states ban both reproductive and research cloning; 10 ban reproductive only and permit research; Minnesota's statute appeared to prohibit biomedical cloning while silent on reproductive; the remaining states had no cloning statute in that survey. A 2022 survey counts differently — counts vary by year and inclusion rules.
Topics: Human Cloning.
United Kingdom — human implants: no implant-specific statute
the framework is the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018, ECHR Article 8, and employment law; no reported UK cases on employee implants and no UK employer publicly known to have required one.
Topics: Human Chip Technology.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 118
the practice of psychology (licensing).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Counseling vs Therapy.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 130
social work definitions (licensing).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Counseling vs Therapy.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 163
allied mental health and human services professions definitions (licensing).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Counseling vs Therapy.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, §§ 7–8
civil commitment petition and court proceedings.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Voluntary vs Involuntary.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, §§ 10–11
voluntary admission and withdrawal from voluntary admission (taught at the general level; cited with full citations in the Adult unit's Sources).
Topics: Voluntary vs Involuntary.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, § 12
emergency restraint and hospitalization (up to 3 days) on likelihood of serious harm by reason of mental illness.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Voluntary vs Involuntary.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, § 35
court-ordered commitment for alcohol or substance use disorder after a hearing, up to 90 days.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Addictions · Voluntary vs Involuntary.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 1
Massachusetts murder defined, and its degrees.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Homicide · Murder.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 13
manslaughter punishment.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Homicide · Manslaughter.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 269, § 17
hazing defined and criminalized; consent is not a defense.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Hazing and Prevention.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 269, § 18
the duty of a person at the scene to report hazing.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Hazing and Prevention.
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 269, § 19
institutional duties: issue the anti-hazing law, adopt a policy, report compliance.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Hazing and Prevention.
National Suicide Hotline Designation Act of 2020, Pub. L. No. 116-172
the act that designated 988 as the universal number for the national suicide prevention and mental health crisis hotline (enacted October 17, 2020; 988 service began nationwide July 16, 2022).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Topics: Suicide and Suicide Prevention (Adult unit carries the citation; the Youth unit describes the law in plain words only).
U.S. Const. amend. II
the Second Amendment's text.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: all four weapons-law units (adult-weapons, le-weapons, adult-licensed, le-licensed)
18 U.S.C. § 922
federal unlawful acts: subsection (g) prohibited-person categories; subsection (n) indictment bar; dealer licensing and background-check structure; subsection (q) school zones. Text read at Cornell LII.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-weapons, le-weapons, adult-licensed
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, § 131
License to Carry: entitlements (including large capacity, subject to § 131M); § 131(b) safety certificate; § 131(d) resident applicants 21+, personal interview on initial application, issuance per § 121F; § 131(e) term up to 6 years expiring on the birthday anniversary; § 131(g) address-change notice within 30 days.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: all four weapons-law units
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, § 121F
licensing machinery: 40-day decision (§ 121F(a)); fingerprints to the colonel within 7 days (§ 121F(c)); prohibited-person definition (§ 121F(j)); suitability standard (§ 121F(k)); record-keeping and automatic disqualification notice (§ 121F(h)); card bears the 988 Lifeline number (§ 121F(i)); $100 fee (§ 121F(o)).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: all four weapons-law units
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, § 131P
basic firearms safety certificate required for licensing applicants; colonel-certified instructors and curriculum; Acts of 2024 amendment (ch. 135, § 74, effective January 25, 2026) adds written examination, live-fire training, and curriculum items including injury/suicide prevention and use-of-force law, with an exemption for persons licensed on August 1, 2024.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: all four weapons-law units
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 269, § 10
carrying offenses in outline: (a) unlicensed carrying outside residence or business (state prison 2.5–5 years or house of correction 18 months–2.5 years, mandatory-minimum features); (j) firearms in schools, colleges, and universities “notwithstanding any license,” with the qualified/retired officer exception stated per LEOSA, 18 U.S.C. §§ 926B–926C; (k) “prohibited areas.”
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-weapons, le-weapons, le-licensed (Sources)
Acts of 2024, ch. 135
An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws: created § 121B (electronic registration) and the § 121F framework, revised § 121 definitions, expanded § 131P.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: all four weapons-law units
Mass.gov application path — “Apply for or renew a firearms license”
residents apply through their city/town police department or the MIRCS Unified Gun Portal; package (application, fee, safety certificate for new applicants, ID, local documents); non-residents through the Firearms Records Bureau (Chelsea), 1-year term, no grace period; fees LTC $100, retired LEO LTC $25, FID $100, FID under 18 $25, non-resident $100.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-licensed, le-licensed; cited in adult-weapons, le-weapons
AG/EOPSS Joint Advisory after Bruen
carrying without a license remains unlawful; prohibited-person and suitability enforcement continues; “good reason” (§ 131(d)) enforcement stops; applicants neither prohibited nor unsuitable are issued unrestricted LTCs.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: all four weapons-law units
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 14
armed burglary of a dwelling at night; assault on occupants; up to life.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 15
unarmed burglary of a dwelling at night.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 16
nighttime breaking and entering of buildings, ships, vehicles; safe/vault attacks.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 17
nighttime entry without breaking / daytime breaking and entering, person lawfully inside put in fear.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 18
nighttime entry without breaking / daytime breaking and entering, no person put in fear.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 19
breaking and entering a railroad car (named in the units only as the end of the §§ 14–19 family range, in Sources).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 17
armed robbery; masked/firearm mandatory minimums.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 19
unarmed robbery (subsection (a) elder victims; (b) general).
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 120
trespass after being forbidden; express tenant exclusion; arrest provision.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258C, § 2
victim compensation eligibility: injury directly resulting, five-day report rule with good-cause and under-18 exceptions, cooperation.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258C, § 3
award limits: $25,000 maximum ($50,000 catastrophic injury), compensable expense categories.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Massachusetts Victims of Violent Crime Compensation (Mass.gov / Massachusetts Office for Victim Assistance)
the state victim-compensation program pages; the Applying page states the three-year application rule, fund-of-last-resort, and covered expenses.
Read it on the publisher’s site · Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md; le-burglary-robbery-and-unlawful-entries.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 30A
shoplifting: six intentional acts; under-$250 graduated fines / third-offense jail; $250-or-more up to $1,000 and 2½ years; § 30A applies to the exclusion of § 30 under $250; warrantless arrest on probable cause, merchant's statement constitutes probable cause.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-loss-prevention.md; le-loss-prevention.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 30
larceny: general theft statute; over-$1,200 (or firearm) up to 5 years state prison; $1,200 or under up to 1 year jail.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-loss-prevention.md; le-loss-prevention.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 94B
merchant detention defense in false arrest/false imprisonment actions: reasonable grounds, reasonable manner, reasonable time, on or in the immediate vicinity of the premises.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-loss-prevention.md; le-loss-prevention.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 85R½
civil recovery for shoplifting/attempted larceny on a merchant's premises: actual damages plus capped additions (up to $50 / $250 / $500 by value tier); demand correspondence must identify the basis in detail; soliciting above the cap is finable. Source note: text verified via the section's text as reproduced in an official malegislature.gov bill document and the chapter's section listing at Justia; the direct malegislature.gov section page could not be opened, so the units link the verified chapter page — PARTIAL VERIFICATION, flagged in the source for Destiny/coordinator.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-loss-prevention.md; le-loss-prevention.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 43A
criminal harassment — the willful and malicious, knowing pattern of conduct directed at a specific person, seriously alarming them and such as would cause a reasonable person substantial emotional distress, expressly including electronic communication.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: Dealing With Attacks in Various Fields (adult and law enforcement); Social Media Crimes units
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 13D
assault and battery upon a public employee — the house-of-correction range of 90 days to two and one-half years or a fine of $500 to $5,000 in the paragraph in effect for most cases; separate paragraphs for an attempt to disarm a police officer and for assault and battery on a police officer causing serious bodily injury; the text itself carries the amendment effective March 3, 2026 addressing assault and battery by bodily substance and transit workers expressly, which the unit notes and dates.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: Dealing With Attacks in Various Fields (law enforcement)
U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 5
the Qualifications Clause — a natural-born citizen, at least thirty-five years of age, and fourteen years a resident within the United States. Constitution Annotated, Congress.gov.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: How to Become President of the USA (adult, youth)
U.S. Const. amend. XII
electors' separate ballots, the majority required, the House contingency, vice-presidential eligibility. National Archives.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: How to Become President of the USA (adult, youth)
U.S. Const. amend. XX, § 1
terms end and begin at noon on January 20. National Archives.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: How to Become President of the USA (adult, youth)
U.S. Const. amend. XXII, § 1
the two-election limit and the partial-term rule. National Archives.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: How to Become President of the USA (adult, youth)
3 U.S.C. ch. 1
appointment of electors, certificates of ascertainment (due not later than six days before the electors meet, per the current federal timeline the Archives page records), the electors' meeting and certificates of vote, and the counting of electoral votes in Congress. National Archives.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: How to Become President of the USA (adult, youth)
Candidate committee registration (Federal Election Commission)
Form 1 registration within 10 days of designation, treasurer and custodian of records; the $5,000 candidacy threshold is stated in the FEC's candidate guides.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: How to Become President of the USA (adult, youth)
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 165A
Establishes the Massachusetts Firefighting Academy, within the Department of Fire Services and responsible to the Massachusetts Fire Training Council, as the agency responsible for training all fire service personnel in the Commonwealth.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-fire-fighter-training.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 111C, § 9
No person may provide EMS or use the EMT titles without completing the department-approved course (or department-approved equivalent training) and meeting the chapter's requirements; the department certifies those who complete them.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-emt-training.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 74
The Board of Registration in Nursing examines applicants who prove good moral character and graduation from a board-approved school for nurses, and registers those found qualified with the right to use the registered nurse title; registration renews biennially with continuing education.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-nurse-training.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 112, § 2
Applicants to the Board of Registration in Medicine must prove age 18+, good moral character, two years of premedical studies, four years of medical school instruction (not less than thirty-two school weeks per year), and the MD degree or its equivalent; qualified applicants are registered as physicians, must show health-information-technology proficiency, and renew every two years.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-doctor-training.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 147, § 23
No person may engage in, advertise, or hold themselves out as engaged in the private detective business or the business of a watch, guard, or patrol agency unless licensed; employees of a licensee and in-house guards/investigators are excepted.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-detective-vs-investigator.md, le-detective-vs-investigator.md, adult-security-training.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 147, § 24
License applications go to the Colonel of the State Police under oath, with certification by three citizens who have known the applicant at least three years and attest to good moral character, plus the experience paths (three years of investigative work or qualifying service, or ten years as an officer in good standing) for the private detective license.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-detective-vs-investigator.md, le-detective-vs-investigator.md, adult-security-training.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 147, § 25
The license runs one year and is annually renewable; no license for a person convicted of a felony in any state; business names may not contain “police” or “fire” or imply government association; revocation for cause after notice and a hearing.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-detective-vs-investigator.md, le-detective-vs-investigator.md, adult-security-training.md
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 31, § 59
Original and promotional appointments in civil service police and fire forces are made only after competitive examination; promotional examinations are generally open only to permanent employees in the next lower title meeting the service requirements stated in the section.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-detective-vs-investigator.md, le-detective-vs-investigator.md
18 U.S.C. § 3056
“Powers, authorities, and duties of United States Secret Service” — lists the protectees the Service is authorized to protect under the Secretary of Homeland Security and grounds its investigative authority.
Read it on the publisher’s site
Taught in: adult-secret-service-training.md
18 U.S.C. § 875
listed in the source as a code taught in the same units as Counterman v. Colorado, Elonis v. United States, and Packingham v. North Carolina; the source gives no separate description or link for this entry.
Taught in: adult-social-media-crimes · le-social-media-crimes · youth-social-media-crimes
18 U.S.C. § 2261A
listed in the source as a code taught in the same units as Counterman v. Colorado, Elonis v. United States, and Packingham v. North Carolina; the source gives no separate description or link for this entry.
Taught in: adult-social-media-crimes · le-social-media-crimes · youth-social-media-crimes
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 43
listed in the source as a code taught in the same units as Counterman v. Colorado, Elonis v. United States, and Packingham v. North Carolina; the source gives no separate description or link for this entry.
Taught in: adult-social-media-crimes · le-social-media-crimes · youth-social-media-crimes
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 258E, § 3
listed in the source as a code taught in the same units as Counterman v. Colorado, Elonis v. United States, and Packingham v. North Carolina; the source gives no separate description or link for this entry.
Taught in: adult-social-media-crimes · le-social-media-crimes · youth-social-media-crimes
Federal Rule of Evidence 702
discussed in the units' Daubert passages and through the case blocks; the source gives no separate code block or link for this entry.
Taught in: adult-forensic-science, le-forensic-science, youth-forensic-science